Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Chapter 11-12 Power Points Reformation and Age of Religious Wars

15 comments:

Gardenia said...

Thanks to these notes I am prepared and ahead of the game.
This unit should be great!

COACH NEAL said...

1st Test clue: What is the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation? Does it conflict with any Protestant doctrines and/or ideals? {Which one(s)}

COACH NEAL said...

Clue #2: Luther vs. Zwingli (What was their dispute about? Explain)

Francesca said...

test clue 2: Luther and Zwingli's dispute was over the Eucharist and whether the bread and wine were symbolic aspects of the church or was meant to be taken literally. Luther believed that the bread was the actual body of Christ and the wine as the blood of Christ. On the other hand, Zwingli believed that they were only representations and only became the "body and blood" of Christ through the blessings of the priest.

Gardenia said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Gardenia said...

Test Clue #1: Transubstantiation is the doctrine that states the change of the substance of bread and wine into the substance of the body and blood of christ. This conflicted with zwingilis idea about consubstantiation which states that the fundemental substance of the body and blood of christ are present alongside th substance of the bread and wine which remain present. Zwingili and Luther defended their points on the eucharistic sacrement and disputed their ideas during the Marburg colloquy.

I sord of answered both test clues in one. Sorry. :)

Tiffany Le said...

Thanks Mr. Neal that was very informative.

Ariel said...

Thanks for answering these questions, guys! I agree with Tiffany - I'll have a better idea of what to study now.

COACH NEAL said...

Oh yes you guys have jumped on board..next clue what does max weber say about capitalism and the Protestant work ethic? How do the anabaptist differ from other Protestants? Is John Calvin more important than Martin Luther? Why? How successful was the Catholic Reformation? Ok that's enough for now..

COACH NEAL said...

How are Elizabeth I and Henry IV examples of politique's?

Kristie Liang said...

Henry IV was a politique because he converted from calvinist to catholic to capture the french throne.

Elizabeth was a politique because she often took both sides of protestants and catholics in order to keep political unity.

...i think lol

COACH NEAL said...

How does the English Civil War differ from the 30 Years War?

Brittany Sam said...

thank you Mr.Neal
this will help a lot.

Ariel said...

Elizabeth I and Henry IV are both considered politiques, since they were rulers who put the needs of their respective countries over their own personal interests. For example, Elizabeth I took the middle ground in most matters concerning Protestant and Catholic disputes. In addition, Henry IV - despite being a Huguenot - publicly converted to Catholicism to show that he put the interests of France's majority over his own beliefs.

COACH NEAL said...

What does the Edict of Nantes do for the people of France?