Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This will be an interactive learning environment for students and parents in my AP European History class. It is my hope that we can create an ongoing dialogue that is rich in intellect and takes learning beyond the four walls of my classroom.
15 comments:
Thanks to these notes I am prepared and ahead of the game.
This unit should be great!
1st Test clue: What is the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation? Does it conflict with any Protestant doctrines and/or ideals? {Which one(s)}
Clue #2: Luther vs. Zwingli (What was their dispute about? Explain)
test clue 2: Luther and Zwingli's dispute was over the Eucharist and whether the bread and wine were symbolic aspects of the church or was meant to be taken literally. Luther believed that the bread was the actual body of Christ and the wine as the blood of Christ. On the other hand, Zwingli believed that they were only representations and only became the "body and blood" of Christ through the blessings of the priest.
Test Clue #1: Transubstantiation is the doctrine that states the change of the substance of bread and wine into the substance of the body and blood of christ. This conflicted with zwingilis idea about consubstantiation which states that the fundemental substance of the body and blood of christ are present alongside th substance of the bread and wine which remain present. Zwingili and Luther defended their points on the eucharistic sacrement and disputed their ideas during the Marburg colloquy.
I sord of answered both test clues in one. Sorry. :)
Thanks Mr. Neal that was very informative.
Thanks for answering these questions, guys! I agree with Tiffany - I'll have a better idea of what to study now.
Oh yes you guys have jumped on board..next clue what does max weber say about capitalism and the Protestant work ethic? How do the anabaptist differ from other Protestants? Is John Calvin more important than Martin Luther? Why? How successful was the Catholic Reformation? Ok that's enough for now..
How are Elizabeth I and Henry IV examples of politique's?
Henry IV was a politique because he converted from calvinist to catholic to capture the french throne.
Elizabeth was a politique because she often took both sides of protestants and catholics in order to keep political unity.
...i think lol
How does the English Civil War differ from the 30 Years War?
thank you Mr.Neal
this will help a lot.
Elizabeth I and Henry IV are both considered politiques, since they were rulers who put the needs of their respective countries over their own personal interests. For example, Elizabeth I took the middle ground in most matters concerning Protestant and Catholic disputes. In addition, Henry IV - despite being a Huguenot - publicly converted to Catholicism to show that he put the interests of France's majority over his own beliefs.
What does the Edict of Nantes do for the people of France?
Post a Comment